How is Mitravan different from Conveyor?

Both automate security questionnaires. Mitravan specialises in the AI-specific sections enterprise buyers now add - model risk, training data, AI vendor risk - and pairs them with an AI inventory and framework mapping for ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and DPDP, with a citation on every answer.

Does Conveyor answer AI security questions?

Conveyor covers security questionnaires broadly and does it well. Mitravan focuses on the AI-specific depth and the governance evidence (AI inventory, framework mapping) that buyers increasingly demand alongside the answers.

How accurate are the answers?

~95% on first pass for standard formats (SIG, CAIQ, custom Excel/Word/PDF). Every answer carries a citation, and your team reviews and approves before anything ships.

Comparison

The AI-native alternative to Conveyor for security questionnaires.

By the Mitravan team · Updated May 2026

Conveyor is a strong security questionnaire automation and Trust Center product. Mitravan overlaps on questionnaires but goes deep on the AI-specific sections enterprise buyers now add - with a citation on every answer, an AI inventory, and framework mapping for ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and DPDP. Here is an honest comparison.

See it on your questionnaire - book 15 min

Mitravan vs Conveyor, at a glance

	Mitravan	Conveyor
Primary focus	AI security questionnaires + AI governance	Security questionnaire automation & Trust Center
Answer security questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ, custom)	Yes - minutes, ~95% first pass	Yes - core product
AI-specific depth (model risk, training data, AI vendor risk)	First-class	General coverage
Citations on every answer	Yes - to your policy / audit / evidence	Yes
AI Inventory (shadow-AI discovery)	Yes - Slack, Okta, GitHub, cloud	Not a focus
Framework mapping (EU AI Act / ISO 42001 / DPDP / NIST AI RMF)	Mapped once, reused everywhere	Limited
DPDP (India) depth	First-class - DPDP DPO-as-Service available	Generic coverage
Human review & approval	Required by design - nothing ships unapproved	Yes
Best for	Teams blocked on the AI sections of security reviews	Teams wanting a broad questionnaire / Trust Center tool

Comparison reflects Mitravan's product focus; Conveyor capabilities evolve - verify current details on their site.

Which should you choose?

If you want a broad questionnaire and Trust Center tool, Conveyor is a capable, mature choice. If your deals specifically stall on the AI sections of security reviews - model risk, training-data handling, AI vendor risk - Mitravan is built for exactly that, with citations and an AI inventory behind every answer.

They can also be complementary: use a Trust Center for sharing, and Mitravan for the AI-questionnaire depth and governance evidence.

New to the category? Start with security questionnaire automation, or see all comparisons.

FAQ

How is Mitravan different from Conveyor?: Both automate security questionnaires. Mitravan specialises in the AI-specific sections enterprise buyers now add - model risk, training data, AI vendor risk - and pairs them with an AI inventory and framework mapping for ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and DPDP, with a citation on every answer.
Does Conveyor answer AI security questions?: Conveyor covers security questionnaires broadly and does it well. Mitravan focuses on the AI-specific depth and the governance evidence (AI inventory, framework mapping) that buyers increasingly demand alongside the answers.
How accurate are the answers?: ~95% on first pass for standard formats (SIG, CAIQ, custom Excel/Word/PDF). Every answer carries a citation, and your team reviews and approves before anything ships.

Answer your next questionnaire in minutes

Bring a real security questionnaire to a 15-minute call and watch Mitravan answer the AI sections, cited to your evidence.

Book a 15-min call